Canon LEGRIA HV40

Canon HV40 versus Sony HDR-XR520
• The Sony HDR-XR520 records to a 240GB internal hard drive (also has a Memory Stick PRO Duo card slot). • Roughly the same size and weight as the HV40, but it actually feels a bit less comfortable in your hand. • The XR520 has a high retail price of $1499, which makes it $500 more than the HV40.
	Panasonic HDC-HS300 Comparison	(Page 14 of 17)	Conclusion

The Sony HDR-XR520 also records to an internal hard drive instead of flash memory. The camcorder does have a flash memory option, however, since it includes a Memory Stick PRO Duo card slot in addition to its 240GB internal hard drive. Yes, you read that correctly, the XR520 has a larger hard drive than most laptops. The camcorder is a lot larger than its flash memory competition, but it is actually a bit smaller than the Canon HV40. So, it seems a gigantic hard drive is now more compact than a MiniDV tape deck.

The practicality of a 240GB hard drive on a camcorder is debatable, but one thing's for sure—you don't have to worry about buying a tape or memory card for a long time. The Sony HDR-XR520 can store over 29 hours of video, at its highest quality setting, to the 240GB hard drive. If you lower things down to a mid-level quality setting, the number jumps close to 60 hours of video. That is a heck of a lot of video to store on a camcorder, which is why some people may be wary of the XR520. If you lose the camcorder or damage the hard drive, you could lose hours upon hours of footage. The HV40, with its tape-based media, automatically produces a tangible copy of everything you record onto MiniDV tape. This makes the HV40 better for someone who wants to instantly archive their footage, although the process of getting that video off the tape and onto a computer can be a hassle.

Looking at performance and controls, the HV40 and Sony HDR-XR520 are quite similar. The XR520 does have a better control dial, a larger LCD screen, and a few more gimmicky options like face detection and smile shutter. Both camcorders handle similarly due to their bulky right-side designs. The HV40 feels a bit more comfortable, thanks to some rounded contours and a slightly more ergonomic design.

Even though the 240GB hard drive is an impressive spec, we feel the HDR-XR520 is a bit overpriced for what you get. It is $500 more than the Canon HV40 and its benefits aren't that much better. Of course, the decision between these two products really comes down to media.

	Comparison Specs
	Canon HV40	Sony HDR-XR520
Price	£ 899	£ 1,199.99
Primary Recording Media	MiniDV Tape	240GB internal hard drive
Secondary Recording Media	MiniSD (photos only)	Memory Stick PRO Duo
Image Sensor	1/2.7-inch CMOS	1/2.88-inch CMOS
Effective Pixel Count	2.07 megapixels (video) 2.76 megapixels (still)	4.15 megapixels (video) 6 megapixels (stills)
Mic Input	Yes, 3.5mm	Yes, 3.5mm
LCD	2.7-inch with 211,000 pixels	3.2-inch with 921,000 pixels
Viewfinder	Yes	Yes
Weight	615g with battery	590g with battery
Dimensions	88 x 82 x 138mm	71 x 75 x 137mm
HD	Yes	Yes
Frame Rates	50i, 25p native progressive	50i
Compression	High Definition: HDV Standard Definition: DV	High Definition: AVCHD Standard Definition: MPEG-4
Maximum Bitrate	25Mbps	16Mbps
Optical Zoom	10x	12x
Stabilisation	Optical	Optical with additional Active Mode

Canon HV40 Bright Light Colour Comparisons
Canon HV40	Sony HDR-XR520

Bright Light Noise Score Comparison