Advertisement

Samsung HMX-R10

First Impressions Review
Samsung HMX-R10
Part 11

Samsung HMX-R10 versus JVC GZ-X900



• The GZ-X900 is twice as expensive as the Samsung HMX-R10.
• Both camcorders have same sensor size, pixel count, and optical zoom.
• The JVC also has slow motion modes, a wide range of still features, and a unique design (with no hand strap).
• The biggest advantage of the GZ-X900 is optical image stabilisation and better bright light performance than the R10.

The Samsung HMX-R10 and the JVC GZ-X900 have a lot of similarities. Both have a 1/2.33-inch CMOS sensor under the hood, can take 9-megapixel still photos, and include a 5x optical zoom. Neither camcorder has any internal memory, and both record to SD/SDHC memory cards. Both camcorders also feature low-quality slow motion modes.

The big difference, however, is the fact that the GZ-X900 is roughly twice the price of the HMX-R10 (£ 720 for the JVC vs. £ 350 for the Samsung). What does the GZ-X900 give you for this extra cash? Optical image stabilisation is the big thing (the R10 only has digital stabilisation), and the X900 has better performance in bright light than the Samsung. Of course, the JVC GZ-X900 is also bigger than the R10, although its smooth, rectangular design makes it quite portable.

While the GZ-X900 did very well in our bright light testing, it ran into a wall when we tested it in low light. Like the Samsung R10, the X900 had horrible low light sensitivity and produced a lot of noise in our testing. Its low light image also produced an odd, greenish hue. The GZ-X900 does not have any alternate frame rates other than its low-quality slow motion modes.

If you want a camcorder that can take 9-megapixel still images, the Samsung HMX-R10 is the better all-around device. The fact that it costs half as much as the GZ-X900 simply reinforces this fact. The Samsung did better in our still image testing and it is a better camcorder in low light conditions than the X900.

  Comparison Specs
 
  Samsung HMX-R10 JVC GZ-X900
Price £ 350 £ 720
Primary Recording Media SD/SDHC memory card SD/SDHC memory card
Secondary Recording Media None None
Image Sensor 1/2.33-inch CMOS 1/2.33-inch CMOS
Effective Pixel Count 5.3 megapixels (video)
9 megapixels (still)
Unknown (video)
9-megapixel (stills)
Mic Input None None
LCD 2.7-inch with 230,000 pixels 2.8-inch with 207,000 pixels
Viewfinder None None
Weight 229g (without battery) 298g
Dimensions 38.3 x 56.8 x 128.2mm 37 x 66 x 124mm
HD Yes Yes
Frame Rates 1080/50i, 1080/25p, 720/50p 1080/50i
Compression H.264 (MPEG-4.AVC) AVCHD
Maximum Bitrate Unknown 24Mbps
Optical Zoom 5x 5x
Stabilisation Digital Optical
  Scores
  Samsung HMX-R10 JVC GZ-X900
Colour 7.22 9.78
Noise 7.15 9.91
Video Sharpness 10.59 12.53
Low Light Sensitivity 0.00 0.00
Low Light Colour 7.98 4.13
Low Light Noise 5.57 1.57
Still Sharpness 8.17 6.92
Still Colour 11.63 9.94
Still Noise 6.35 1.39
  Colour Comparison
 
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Red
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Green
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Blue
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Skin
Tone 1
  Samsung
HMX-R10
JVC GZ-X900
Skin
Tone 2
Video Sharpness Score Comparisons
Video Sharpness
Loading Recently Viewed Products
Advertisement

Latest News & Reviews

Top Rated Camcorders

Features

  • Video Editing Software For Your Camcorder

    We take an in-depth look at the most common video editing software packages, including the basic programs that come packaged with your camcorder. Read More...

  • Camcorderinfo.co.uk Select Awards 2009

    It’s time once again for our annual CamcorderInfo select awards. Each year, we honor the camcorders that really rise above the rest during our review process. The camcorders you’ll read about below have all survived a battery of tests—tests that are designed to give every camcorder fair and equal treatment. These models have also been carefully compared to the competition. Read More...

Advertisement
Samsung HMX-R10
First Impressions Review