Sony Handycam HDR-XR520VE
Panasonic HDC-HS300 Comparison
Prev
Page 13 of 17
Next
News
- Canon Announces New Compact Professional Camcorders—the XF105 and the XF100 - August 31, 2010
- Full Details Released on the World's First 3D Consumer Camcorder The Panasonic HDC-SDT750 - July 27, 2010
- New JVC Everio GZ-HD620 Released in Japan - December 07, 2009
- Sanyo's VPC-HD2000A and VPC-FH1A support Apple's new Video Format iFrame - October 14, 2009
Top Lab Tested Camcorders
| 1. |
Panasonic HDC-TM700
|
|
| 2. |
JVC Everio GZ-HM1
|
|
| 3. |
Canon Legria HF S21
|
|
| 4. |
Panasonic HDC-HS300
|
|
| 5. |
JVC Everio GZ-HM400
|
Latest Reviews
- JVC Everio GZ-HM1 Camcorder Review - August 12, 2010
- Canon Legria HF S21 Camcorder Review - July 01, 2010
- Panasonic HDC-TM700 Camcorder Review - May 24, 2010
- Samsung HMX-R10 Camcorder Review - February 02, 2010
- Video Editing Software For Your Camcorder - January 22, 2010
| Sony HDR-XR520VE versus Panasonic HDC-HS300 | ||||
• The Panasonic outperforms the Sony in everything except noise and stabilisation• It is especially strong in low light, with superior sensitivity and optional 25p recording • Both are excellent manual control camcorders: the Sony has WB/AE shift and a more versatile control dial, but no aperture, shutter speed, or gain control • The Panasonic is more user friendly, with fun iA technologies like AF/AE Tracking and more intuitive menus |
||||
|
Canon HF S100 Comparison | (Page 13 of 17) | Sanyo VPC-HD2000 Comparison | |
The Panasonic HDC-HS300 is a tough camcorder to beat. In video performance alone, the Panasonic outstrips the Sony in everything but noise. Colour accuracy and sharpness are particularly impressive. It's also a clear winner in low light performance, producing much higher sensitivity and the option of recording in 25p. While the Sony's optical image stabilisation is superior, the Panasonic's stabilisation is also quite good (both of these camcorders are head and shoulders above the rest). Still image performance is a bit better on the Sony, but that is not a very compelling reason to purchase a high definition camcorder these days.
For manual control users, the Panasonic offers quite a few options, including independent aperture, shutter speed, and gain control—three features conspicuously absent on the XR520. There is also a viewfinder for more accurate image adjustment and a great big manual control lens ring to make focus a dream (especially when paired with a basic focus assist tool). The one disappointment is that the ring can only be used for zoom and focus when the LCD panel is closed. Other features are only available when you are using the viewfinder. That makes the Sony's control dial a bit more versatile.
The Sony does offer some features that make operation simpler, such as the slick touch screen spot metering and spot focus. But with Panasonic's move to the touch screen, you can do spot metering/focus and take advantage of all the iA features Panasonic has to offer, such as AF/AE tracking. Finally, the Panasonic is a lot more accessible to beginners, with more intuitively organized menus and tools to help guide the first-time camcorder user.
Unless there are specific details about the Sony that really capture your attention (like GPS, a 240GB hard drive, or standard definition compression options), the Panasonic seems to be a clear winner.
| Comparison Specs | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Sony HDR-XR520VE | Panasonic HDC-HS300 | |
| Price | £1,199.99 | £1,039 |
| Primary Recording Media | 240GB internal hard drive | 32GB of built-in flash memory |
| Secondary Recording Media | Memory Stick Pro Duo card | SD/SDHC memory card |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.88-inch CMOS | Three 1/4.1-inch CMOS |
| Effective Pixel Count | 4.15-megapixels (video) 6-megapixels (stills) |
2.07-megapixels (x 3) video 2.32-megapixels (x 3) stills |
| Mic Input | Yes, 3.5mm | Yes, 3.5mm |
| LCD | 3.2-inch with 921,000-pixel resolution |
2.7-inch with 230,400-pixel resolution |
| Viewfinder | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 590g (including battery) | 445g (including battery) |
| Dimensions | 71 x 75 x 137 mm |
72 x 70 x 141mm |
| HD | Yes | Yes |
| Frame Rates | 1080/50i | 1080/50i, 25p (digital cinema mode) |
| Compression | AVCHD | AVCHD |
| Maximum Bitrate | 16Mbps | 17 Mbps |
| Optical Zoom | 12x | 12x |
| Stabilisation | Optical (with two settings: standard and active) |
Optical |
| Scores | ||
| Sony HDR-XR520VE | Panasonic HDC-HS300 | |
| Colour | 7.68 | 8.01 |
| Noise | 6.21 | 11.89 |
| Video Sharpness | 10.59 | 10.97 |
| Low Light Sensitivity | 3.77 | 8.38 |
| Low Light Colour | 6.92 | 4.42 |
| Low Light Noise | 11.02 | 11.3 |
| Still Sharpness | 6.97 | 4.47 |
| Battery Life | 92 minutes | 105 minutes |
| Sony HDR-XR520VE Colour Comparisons | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Sony HDR-XR520VE | Panasonic HDC-HS300 |
| Low Light Sensitivity | ||
| Mode | Sony HDR-XR520VE | Panasonic HDC-HS300 |
| Auto Gain | 16 Lux | 8 Lux |
| 25p Mode | N/A | 8 Lux |
• The Panasonic outperforms the Sony in everything except noise and stabilisation



