Sony Handycam HDR-XR520VE
Sanyo VPC-HD2000 Comparison
Prev
Page 14 of 17
Next
News
- Canon Announces New Compact Professional Camcorders—the XF105 and the XF100 - August 31, 2010
- Full Details Released on the World's First 3D Consumer Camcorder The Panasonic HDC-SDT750 - July 27, 2010
- New JVC Everio GZ-HD620 Released in Japan - December 07, 2009
- Sanyo's VPC-HD2000A and VPC-FH1A support Apple's new Video Format iFrame - October 14, 2009
Top Lab Tested Camcorders
| 1. |
Panasonic HDC-TM700
|
£0.00 |
| 2. |
JVC Everio GZ-HM1
|
£0.00 |
| 3. |
Canon Legria HF S21
|
£0.00 |
| 4. |
Panasonic HDC-HS300
|
£0.00 |
| 5. |
JVC Everio GZ-HM400
|
£0.00 |
Latest Reviews
- Sony HDR-CX550VE Camcorder Review - September 10, 2010
- JVC Everio GZ-HM1 Camcorder Review - August 12, 2010
- Canon Legria HF S21 Camcorder Review - July 01, 2010
- Panasonic HDC-TM700 Camcorder Review - May 24, 2010
- Samsung HMX-R10 Camcorder Review - February 02, 2010
| Sony HDR-XR520VE versus Sanyo VPC-HD2000 | ||||
• The two are very similar in terms of video sharpness; the Sony wins in noise and the Sanyo wins in colour and still performance• The Sanyo has impressively smooth 60p video, plus the option of shooting in 60i or 30p • The Sanyo completely outclasses the Sony in low light performance • The Sanyo has independent aperture, shutter speed, and ISO control, but relies on the joystick and LCD, while the Sony is slightly more limited but gives the user more powerful tools (like a great cam control dial and viewfinder) • The Sanyo may as well not have any stabilisation at all, while the Sony has excellent optical image stabilisation • Neither is particularly beginner-friendly |
||||
|
Panasonic HDC-HS300 Comparison | (Page 14 of 17) | Conclusion | |
The Sony HDR-XR520VE and the Sanyo VPC-HD2000 are an unlikely coupling: one the flagship camcorder from a major manufacturer with 240 GB of internal hard drive capacity and the other a strange little dark horse worth half the price of its powerful competitor. In terms of video performance, the Sanyo actually has superior colour and just about the same sharpness. The Sony once again wins in noise—as it does compared to just about every camcorder this year. And while the Sony's motion looks very good, it's difficult to compete with the 60p video offered on the Sanyo.
The biggest surprise this year has been the Sanyo's superb low light performance, which is among the best camcorders we have tested so far. Low light footage is crisp, clear, and vibrant, especially compared to the Sony's relatively dark image. The Sanyo also offers a 30p mode, which further improves performance, though it is hard to top the already stellar 60p results.
Where the Sony really pulls ahead, however, is in manual controls. The dial and viewfinder are essential tools that the Sanyo lacks. You get lots of flexibility with the Sanyo's independent aperture, shutter speed, and ISO controls, but it's all done with a joystick and LCD. Plus, the Sony has an impressive optical image stabilisation, compared to the Sanyo's abysmal digital stabilisation. If stabilisation is important to you, the Sony might be a better choice. However, if you shoot a lot in low light, the Sanyo is an excellent choice. Plus, the money you save could be used to invest in a monopod for improving stabilisation.
| Comparison Specs | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Sony HDR-XR520VE | Sanyo VPC-HD2000 | |
| Price | £1,199.99 | £449 |
| Primary Recording Media | 240GB internal hard drive | SD/SDHC Memory Card |
| Secondary Recording Media | Memory Stick Pro Duo card | None |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.88-inch CMOS | 1/2.5-inch CMOS |
| Effective Pixel Count | 4.15-megapixels (video) 6-megapixels (stills) |
5.31-megapixels (video) 8.0-megapixels (stills) |
| Mic Input | Yes, 3.5mm | Yes, 3.5 |
| LCD | 3.2-inch with 921,000-pixel resolution |
2.7-inch with 230,000-pixel resolution |
| Viewfinder | Yes | No |
| Weight | 590g (including battery) | 311g (including battery) |
| Dimensions | 71 x 75 x 137 | 90 x 112.6 x 54.5mm |
| HD | Yes | Yes |
| Frame Rates | 1080/50i | HD: 1080/60p, 1080/50i, 1080/30p, 720/30p SD: 240fps (448 x 336), 600fps (192 x 108) |
| Compression | AVCHD | MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 |
| Maximum Bitrate | 16Mbps | 24Mbps |
| Optical Zoom | 12x | 10x |
| Stabilisation | Optical (with two settings: standard and active) |
Digital |
| Scores | ||
| Sony HDR-XR520VE | Sanyo VPC-HD2000 | |
| Colour | 7.68 | 10.06 |
| Noise | 6.21 |
9.53 |
| Video Sharpness | 10.59 | 10.59 |
| Low Light Sensitivity | 3.77 | 7.7 |
| Low Light Colour | 6.92 | 9.79 |
| Low Light Noise | 11.02 | 9.83 |
| Still Sharpness | 6.97 | 11.05 |
| Battery Life | 92 minutes | 112 minutes |
| Low Light Comparison | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Sony HDR-XR520VE | Sanyo VPC-HD2000 |
| Stabilisation Score Comparisons |
![]() |
• The two are very similar in terms of video sharpness; the Sony wins in noise and the Sanyo wins in colour and still performance




